So, I was thinking, there were the two sides: the ones who bellieved in absolute truths and those that believed you brought something of your own to every truth. Scientific fact would be considered an absolute truth then, right? The how do they justify the discovery of new facts and the change of old ones as a result of more research?
I think what was being said in class about how science was full of rhetoric is right on the money.
I really don't to much to say on this that wasn't covered in class...
No comments:
Post a Comment